![]() “An agreement is ambiguous if as a whole or by its terms and conditions it can reasonably be interpreted in more than one way.” Haggin v. ![]() Brumer, Cohen, Logan, Kandell & Kaufman, 580 So. “Whether a contract provision is ambiguous is a question of law, to be determined by the court.” Hancock v. “Under Florida law, courts must give effect to the plain language of contracts when that language is clear and unambiguous.” Homes & Land Affiliates, LLC v. When the meaning of a contract term is clear, the Judge can interpret the contract without hearing evidence about what the parties believe the meaning of the term is. ![]() The Mavrick Law Firm represents clients in breach of contract litigation, non-compete agreement litigation, trade secret litigation, trademark infringement litigation, and other legal disputes in federal and state courts and in arbitration. Peter Mavrick is a Miami business litigation attorney, and also represents clients in business litigation in Miami and Palm Beach. On the other hand, a business which can show that a contract term is ambiguous can avoid summary judgment and provide “parol” evidence at trial to support the defendant’s interpretation of the contract term. A business that can show to the court that an important contract term favors the business and is not ambiguous can potentially prevail on summary judgment without the time and expense of a trial. ![]() Litigation concerning whether a disputed contract term is ambiguous can be critical in how a case will ultimately be decided. A contract that may seem clear pre-dispute can often be interpreted differently after a dispute has arisen. Businesses involved in breach of contract cases will often dispute the meaning of contract terms. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |